temporality
RUEdit this page↗
Working with the agent

Agents and teams

Creating and configuring agents — models, tools, sandboxes, evolution; agent teams as pipelines.

An agent is a named configuration: a model, a system prompt contract (purpose, constraints, completion checks), tools, a sandbox, access grants. Managed on the Agents page (/agent-config).

#Creating an agent

The agent card

Three ways:

  1. From a template — ready-made roles: Lead, Developer, Reviewer, QA, Analyst and more.
  2. From a description — describe in plain words what the agent should do; the builder drafts the name, purpose, constraints and completion checks (as a draft until you confirm).
  3. Manually — the full form: model, tools, MCP servers, sandbox.

#What is configurable

The agent switch is the toggle in the bottom-right corner of the mini-card: a disabled agent starts no new runs — API starts, intake, triggers and delegation all refuse — while runs already in flight finish. Every flip is recorded in the audit log.

Setting What it gives
Model The model name; if the default provider does not have it, the call is routed to a provider that declares it
Tools Allowlist/denylist over the shared catalog (files, commands, web, knowledge, skills, artifacts, MCP)
Capabilities Declarative permissions ("read files", "network", "modify files") — delegating agents and policies rely on them
Sandbox The execution profile: image, memory, CPU, tmpfs limits, cache variables (see Administration)
Notification channels Where ask_human questions are delivered

Constraints and completion checks are part of the contract: they enter the prompt and the result verification.

#Background commands

Long sandbox operations — dependency installs, builds, big test suites — no longer block the agent. run_command with background: true runs detached: the tool returns an operation id immediately, the agent keeps working, and the result (exit code + output tail) arrives automatically as a follow-up message in the conversation.

Details and delivery guarantees — docs/agent-async-operations.md.

#Agent evolution

Evolution: versions, gate, regressions

The agent can propose changes to its own configuration (the agent_propose tool): the problem with evidence (run ids), the change and the expected effect. The proposal lands in the agent's card as a draft.

Applying it goes through the quality loop: a proposal is applied only on top of a fresh green evaluation run (golden cases from real runs, optionally a calibrated LLM judge). A human decides; a proposal can never widen the agent's powers. Details — docs/agent-quality-loop.md.

#Teams

A team is a slot manifest: roles (Developer, Reviewer, QA…), their bindings to concrete agents, the execution protocol (pipeline/DAG), rework limits and a budget. Built from a description ("A team with quality control: Developer implements, Security and QA review, Reviewer accepts") and versioned.

Launching a team from chat or a trigger starts a DAG execution with review gates — see docs/agent-teams.md.

#Proposals and versions

Every applied change creates a new version of the agent definition; the version history with who and why is in the agent's card. Rollback is picking a previous version.